[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Optional features

Donovan Kolbly <donovan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is there established terminology for portions of SRFIs that are
> optional? 

No.  We really need more infrastructure to talk about these things.
(The same problem has shown up with SRFI 68.)  We're working on it.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla