This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 76 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 76 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Michael Sperber wrote:
Richard Kelsey <kelsey@xxxxxxx> writes:
Actually, it does give an order. "Parent init expressions, if any, are evaluated before child init expressions."
Actually, the draft says this in the section on INIT! (with the bang), where it seems fine.
It is quiet on the field initializations. For the latter, if the currentdraft were to stand, I would prefer that it remain unspecified. In the most obvious functional approach, the child fields are more naturally evaluated first.