"types" or "records"?

[Donovan Kolbly <donovan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Some of the terminology in this SRFI seems inconsistent.  The procedural 
layer talks about constructing "record type descriptors" (i.e., 
make-record-type-descriptor), but the syntactic layers talk about defining 
types (i.e., define-type and type-descriptor).

The very title of the SRFI suggests that it's about records.  Shouldn't 
the syntactic layer be consistent with that?

-- Donovan Kolbly                    (  d.kolbly@xxxxxxxxxxx
				     (  http://www.rscheme.org/~donovan/