[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

"types" or "records"?



Some of the terminology in this SRFI seems inconsistent. The procedural layer talks about constructing "record type descriptors" (i.e., make-record-type-descriptor), but the syntactic layers talk about defining types (i.e., define-type and type-descriptor).

The very title of the SRFI suggests that it's about records. Shouldn't the syntactic layer be consistent with that?

-- Donovan Kolbly                    (  d.kolbly@xxxxxxxxxxx
				     (  http://www.rscheme.org/~donovan/