[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Namespaces

To: srfi-72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Namespaces
From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:47:45 +0200
Delivered-to: srfi-72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <877jeny7vd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Marcin Kowalczyk's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:30:46 +0200")
Mail-followup-to: srfi-72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0508141113450.22403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ofslxc5npp.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0508141551430.22786@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8764u8hxgc.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0508142059240.23584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <877jeny7vd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hmm, I thought that it's not the case, your system must be different
> from what I had in mind. I understand that syntax-rules and
> syntax-case need this, but I thought that a new system based on
> syntax quasiquotation doesn't need this.

Ah, it's indeed not known even with quasiquotation, because of macros
producing macros. It's more complicated than I expected...

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

References:
- Namespaces
  - From: Andre van Tonder
- Re: Namespaces
  - From: Martin Gasbichler
- Re: Namespaces
  - From: Andre van Tonder
- Re: Namespaces
  - From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Namespaces
  - From: Andre van Tonder
- Re: Namespaces
  - From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

Prev by Date: Connection between runtime and expand-time
Next by Date: Re: Namespaces
Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces
Next by thread: Re: Namespaces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread