[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI

 Keith Wright wrote:
 > Hidden away in the reference implementation, and in
 > an unannounced SRFI are the keywords
 >   (begin-for-syntax ...)
 > and
 >   (begin-for-import ...).
 > These are part of the module system, but I think they should be
 > part of the macro system (srfi-72).
 Yes, I have been thinking about including begin-for-syntax,
 but I first would like to understand it better.  
 By the way, the current module system is deprecated while I am 
 rethinking some of the phase separation issues.