[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 72 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 72 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

 Keith Wright wrote:
 > Hidden away in the reference implementation, and in
 > an unannounced SRFI are the keywords
 >   (begin-for-syntax ...)
 > and
 >   (begin-for-import ...).
 > These are part of the module system, but I think they should be
 > part of the macro system (srfi-72).
 Yes, I have been thinking about including begin-for-syntax,
 but I first would like to understand it better.  
 By the way, the current module system is deprecated while I am 
 rethinking some of the phase separation issues.