[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI
Keith Wright wrote:
> Hidden away in the reference implementation, and in
> an unannounced SRFI are the keywords
> (begin-for-syntax ...)
> (begin-for-import ...).
> These are part of the module system, but I think they should be
> part of the macro system (srfi-72).
Yes, I have been thinking about including begin-for-syntax,
but I first would like to understand it better.
By the way, the current module system is deprecated while I am
rethinking some of the phase separation issues.