[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rationale question
Mike Sperber wrote:
> I'm not sure what VALUES->LIST is supposed
to be---given the symmetry
> between return values and arguments, I'd say it'd have to be
> (define (values->list . vals)
> This procedure is called LIST in R5RS, so LIST-VALUES isn't a name
> symmetric with anything. UNLIST seems fine.
> Or am I missing something?
I think you do. Please refer to the
previous incarnation of this discussion:
Aparently there is some comment missing
in the SRFI text.