[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rationale question

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 71 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 71 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Mike Sperber wrote:
> I'm not sure what VALUES->LIST is supposed to be---given the symmetry
> between return values and arguments, I'd say it'd have to be
> (define (values->list . vals)
>   vals)
> This procedure is called LIST in R5RS, so LIST-VALUES isn't a name
> symmetric with anything.  UNLIST seems fine.

> Or am I missing something?

I think you do. Please refer to the previous incarnation of this discussion:


Aparently there is some comment missing in the SRFI text.