[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Aubrey Jaffer <agj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Yes, I should have written "inexact numbers".
Ok, but when we speak of symbolic "infinite precision" representations
of sqrt(2), presumably we are using exact numbers.
> Can number->string return a string which can't be READ as a number?
> I had thought that 6.2.4 "Syntax of numerical constants" and 7.1.1
> "Lexical structure" applied to the results of NUMBER->STRING. If they
> are independent, a note about that should be added to the report.
I think they do, but implementations certainly can extend the syntax
of numbers if they wish (provided that NUMBER->STRING, STRING->NUMBER,
and READ all behave in the expected way).