[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)

To: srfi-70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
From: Ken Dickey <Ken.Dickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 06:02:16 -0700
Delivered-to: srfi-70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050522212529.5841C1B77B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: BitWize Consulting
References: <20050520022827.D9E0C134@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200505212139.OAA01783@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050522212529.5841C1B77B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.7

On Sunday 22 May 2005 14:25, Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
>  | > How about "1/0." and "-1/0."?
...
> Those would work.

I am fine with this syntax, but note that some Schemes do support exact floats 
[e.g. (exact? 1.3) -> #t or #f depending on how the result was obtained].

Cheers,
-KenD

References:
- My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
  - From: Chongkai Zhu
- Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
  - From: Alef Null Petrofsky
- Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
  - From: Aubrey Jaffer

Prev by Date: Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
Next by Date: Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
Previous by thread: Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
Next by thread: Re: My ideas about infinity in Scheme (revised)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread