Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• SRFI-44 compatibility, Scott G. Miller
  • Re: SRFI-44 compatibility, bear
    • Re: SRFI-44 compatibility, Scott G. Miller
      • Re: SRFI-44 compatibility, bear
• provided for compatibility, Neil W. Van Dyke
  • Re: provided for compatibility, Shiro Kawai
• hash-table-update!, felix winkelmann
• introspection, Shiro Kawai
• various remarks, Sebastian Egner
• Naming, Marc Feeley
  • Re: Naming, Michael Sperber
    • Re: Naming, feeley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Naming, Alex Shinn
• Creation parameters, Marc Feeley
• eq? tables, Marc Feeley
• Hash procedures, Marc Feeley
• hash-table-for-each parameter order, Ken Dickey
  • Re: hash-table-for-each parameter order, Marc Feeley
• conversion from and to hash tables, Sven . Hartrumpf
• PING, Panu Kalliokoski
• Responses to your comments, Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Responses to your comments, bear
    • Re: Responses to your comments, Scott G. Miller
      • Re: Responses to your comments, Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Responses to your comments, Sven . Hartrumpf
    • Re: Responses to your comments, Panu
• Discussion about your comments, Panu Kalliokoski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Discussion about your comments, Sebastian Egner
• Revised draft available, David Van Horn
  • Optional arguments, Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: Optional arguments, Panu A Kalliokoski
  • Time complexity, Jens Axel Søgaard
• Modifications that will probably (not) go into next revision, Panu A. Kalliokoski
• Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?, Tony Garnock-Jones
  • Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?, Panu Kalliokoski
    • Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?, Tony Garnock-Jones
      • Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?, Panu A Kalliokoski
    • Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?, Thien-Thi Nguyen
• Handling of default values, Panu
• New revision, near finalization, David Van Horn
• SRFI-69: hash-table-size, Sven . Hartrumpf
  • Re: SRFI-69: hash-table-size, Scott G. Miller
  • Re: SRFI-69: hash-table-size, David Van Horn
    • Re: SRFI-69: hash-table-size, Panu
• hash for eq?, Per Bothner
  • Re: hash for eq?, Panu Kalliokoski
    • Re: hash for eq?, Per Bothner
• should hash function upper bound be exclusive?, Per Bothner
  • Re: should hash function upper bound be exclusive?, bear
    • Re: should hash function upper bound be exclusive?, Per Bothner
  • Re: should hash function upper bound be exclusive?, Panu Kalliokoski
• Re: error in hash table reference implementation, Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: error in hash table reference implementation, Panu
• Draft period extension, new draft, David Van Horn
• Comments on SRFI 69, David Van Horn
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, Panu Kalliokoski
    • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, felix winkelmann
    • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, David Van Horn
      • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, felix winkelmann
        • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, David Van Horn
          • Re: Comments on SRFI 69, felix winkelmann
• Still on David's issues; SRFI 44, Panu Kalliokoski
  • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44, bear
    • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44, Panu Kalliokoski
      • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44, bear
  • Re: Still on David's issues; SRFI 44, David Van Horn
• Mutating keys, David Van Horn
  • Re: Mutating keys, Panu Kalliokoski
    • Re: Mutating keys, Alex Shinn
• Drop ref/default, update!/default, David Van Horn
• SRFI 69 update, David Van Horn
  • Re: SRFI 69 update, Tony Garnock-Jones
    • hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update), Panu Kalliokoski
      • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update), Tony Garnock-Jones
        • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update), Panu Kalliokoski
          • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update), Tony Garnock-Jones
            • Re: hash-table-*/default (Re: SRFI 69 update), Panu Kalliokoski