[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?

To: Panu Kalliokoski <atehwa@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Jul 2005 02:21:32 -0400
Cc: Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, srfi-69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050707122530.GB1924@humma>
References: <42CCFCAE.1050705@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050707122530.GB1924@humma>
Sender: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Panu Kalliokoski <atehwa@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'd like to hear more opinions on this.

i'm in favor of failure-thunk.
other interfaces can build on it easily.

thi

References:
- Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?
  - From: Tony Garnock-Jones
- Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?
  - From: Panu Kalliokoski

Prev by Date: Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?
Next by Date: Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?
Previous by thread: Re: Lambda The Ultimate: use failure-thunk instead of default value?
Next by thread: Handling of default values
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread