This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 68 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 68 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: finishing output translating stream Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:19:41 +0200 > bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Shiro Kawai wrote: > > > >>From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Subject: Re: finishing output translating stream > >>Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:15:57 +0200 > >> > >>last few characters might be sitting in the character conversion > >>buffer. > >> > >>But I might be able to achieve it by creating and closing a > >>stream each time I want a complete "packet". Though it > >>seems to me lots of overhead, it may be doable. > > > > The rational alternative is, of course, an explicit flush-stream > > call. > > Indeed, but the SRFI already has this (FLUSH-OUTPUT-STREAM), which is > why I'm confused. I thought we were talking how flush-output-stream tells the fact that flushing is requested to the 'translate-proc'. Am I missing something? --shiro