[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Compositionality
- To: srfi-64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Compositionality
- From: Noel Welsh <noelwelsh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:17:53 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Delivered-to: srfi-64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eIE1urfAxzwLq98JT0tAqRnT1tmWFiQfmSu6TdsGykpwzBJbs5Idbzl//J5aIEOVtZ120UnigBY6dulto6Tva5LrCtFUzH42uHFRwX9GFsMguCtDLHTYZP3hc/Pl5d/ksBB739GAFfDZ/9lyNrv83Cm5ndt5pls7Ho+gaATVoCw= ;
Why isn't this test framework compositional? The spec
makes explicit mention of this, but doesn't justify it. It
feels really...old-fashioned to program in this way, and to
my mind un-Schemely. Unsurprisingly I hold that SchemeUnit
is a better approach.
Cheers,
Noel
Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com
AIM: noelhwelsh
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/