[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 58 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 58 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.



From: "Bradd W. Szonye" <bradd+srfi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:59:27 -0800

> I have a better solution: If the "array" has rank 0, also omit the "#"!
> After all, that's what the Scheme writer will do when printing a scalar.
> 
> This solution is more obvious if you use "#" instead of "x" for the
> bound separators, e.g.:
> 
>     Two dimensions  #2#3((11 12 13) (21 22 23))
>     One dimension   #3(1 2 3)
>     No dimensions   1

This conflicts with srfi-38.

Dropping 'A' might also cause some confusion with srfi-38,
e.g. #3=(1 2 3) and #3(1 2 3), but it's a matter of degree, I guess.

--shiro