[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: self evaluation, immutability

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 58 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 58 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.



 | Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 19:14:15 -1000 (HST)
 | From: Shiro Kawai <shiro@xxxxxxxx>
 | 
 | srfi-58-new.html has an example:
 | 
 |   (array-dimensions #2A:integer+16((0 1 2) (3 5 4))) ==> (2 3)
 | 
 | Do you suggest arrays are self-evaluating objects, or a quote is
 | simply missing before the array literal?

The quote was missing.  I have expanded that section to:

  A two-by-three array of nonnegative 16.bit integers is written:

  #2A:integer+16((0 1 2) (3 5 4))

  Note that this is the external representation of an array, not an
  expression evaluating to a array.  Like vector constants, array
  constants must be quoted:

  '#2a:INTEGER+16((0 1 2) (3 5 4))
		 ==> #2A:integer+16((0 1 2) (3 5 4))

 | I also assume literal arrays are immutable, like literal strings
 | and vectors, right?  Although the immutability is implied from
 | R5RS section 3.4, it may be nice to have it explicit in srfi-58,
 | since I see modifying literal values is a common type of errors.

Thanks for your suggestions.  I have added the paragraph:

  Literal array constants are immutable objects.  It is an error to
  attempt to store a new value into a location that is denoted by an
  immutable object.