This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 58 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 58 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Aubrey Jaffer wrote: >Another possibility is to use the word "natural" for nonnegative >integers: > >exact 64.bit natural-number #nA:natural-64 >exact 32.bit natural-number #nA:natural-32 >exact 16.bit natural-number #nA:natural-16 >exact 8.bit natural-number #nA:natural-8 Nix. Not what mathematicians mean by "natural numbers." Guaranteed to cause confusion when someone presumes that he can't store zero, or is allowed to divide by something because it can't be zero, etc. "Nonnegative" is the word that means what you want in mathematics, "Unsigned" is the word that means what you want in computer science. Bear