[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

precision of signed integers

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 58 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 58 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: srfi-58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: precision of signed integers
From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:01:45 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: srfi-58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

A 16.bit unsigned integer is 16.bit wide.

Is the corresponding width signed integer 16.bit or 15.bit?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: precision of signed integers
  - From: Joseph Osako

Prev by Date: Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10
Next by Date: Re: #\a octothorpe syntax vs SRFI 10
Previous by thread: Revised draft available
Next by thread: Re: precision of signed integers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread