[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Syntax-case implementation

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 57 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 57 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Andre van Tonder <andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Syntax-case implementation
From: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:39:01 -0800 (PST)
Cc: srfi-57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0502222137060.8336@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0502222137060.8336@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


This shadows several commonly-used syntactic keywords such
as define-generic, with semantics that may contradict the
usual uses of those keywords.

Are the module systems in use uniformly able to overcome
this, or is this a serious issue?

				Bear

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Syntax-case implementation
  - From: Andre van Tonder

References:
- Syntax-case implementation
  - From: Andre van Tonder

Prev by Date: Syntax-case implementation
Next by Date: Psyntax implementation
Previous by thread: Syntax-case implementation
Next by thread: Re: Syntax-case implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread