[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: records all have same internal-name

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 57 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 57 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Per Bothner wrote:

Andre van Tonder wrote:

SFI-9 only defines define-record-type at top-level.  The SRFI-9
reference implementation is not "declarative" - it maps a
compile-time-visible define-record-type to calls to a run-time
functions.  That does not how I want my implementation to be,
so instead of the referece implmentation I some simple macros
that translate define-record-type to the Kawa special form

You are right. The reference implementation depends on a particular implementation detail of SRFI-9, which was not documented (until now).