[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: finalize or withdraw?

To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: finalize or withdraw?
From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:21:22 +0900
Cc: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m0zsfjHGevh7hxAk/5N4HrNA/bnygINXcxcWoqsd7NvOoVd9AgRxqokNC9S3ByRGhBrEfOzeDAGs6fEVlPpvRACGX0qzfXmVgPXAv/iwxs4IY56kZOC8+VgKqBZMbP4uKzneVWBWg+T1qRUB95znsAiHC5SQuTcGK2XcTMDDhZA=
In-reply-to: <87r7cqsdvv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5fb7e08705081821246fa303c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87r7cqsdvv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 8/19/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> An assembler does not write strings "within the binary data".

I'm generalizing here.  Note the proposed solutions mention
specific encodings.  The point being we need to somehow
or other move from a Scheme string object to the serialized
sequence of bytes and vice versa.  As is, SRFI-56 does not
allow this.

-- 
Alex

References:
- finalize or withdraw?
  - From: Alex Shinn
- Re: finalize or withdraw?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG

Prev by Date: Re: finalize or withdraw?
Next by Date: Re: update: can you pass the SRFI-56 challenge?
Previous by thread: Re: finalize or withdraw?
Next by thread: Re: finalize or withdraw?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread