[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: update: can you pass the SRFI-56 challenge?
On 8/19/05, Matthias Radestock <matthias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, thanks for the detailed comments on SISC.
> SISC's character i/o is unicode-based. That makes the byte i/o
> operations in the reference implementation behave incorrectly. SISC does
> support binary i/o, and it is necessary (and possible, but not as easy
> as it should be) to implement these operations in terms of that.
I was using SISC's binary I/O procedures assuming that would make
read-char etc. behave on octet values (Latin-1). This was necessary
to pass the integer tests, which failed before. Is this the wrong approach?
I don't see how the integer tests could have passed if read-char was
assuming any other encoding.