[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bytes vs. octets

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 56 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 56 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bytes vs. octets
From: Alex Shinn <foof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:52:48 -0500
Cc: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87y8jbowm9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <867jqvsy7m.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87pt4ns6rd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <86hdpzkqgg.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87y8jbowm9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At 15 Sep 2004 18:01:18 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 
> So go ahead and name the functions whatever you want, after taking all
> factors into account.  But don't then back up your decision with the
> dishonest claim that your usage is "universally accepted".

You're right, I meant "universally understood."

-- 
Alex

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bytes vs. octets
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG

References:
- bytes vs. octets
  - From: Alex Shinn
- Re: bytes vs. octets
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: bytes vs. octets
  - From: Alex Shinn
- Re: bytes vs. octets
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG

Prev by Date: Re: bytes vs. octets
Next by Date: Re: bytes vs. octets
Previous by thread: Re: bytes vs. octets
Next by thread: Re: bytes vs. octets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread