This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 55 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 55 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
At Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:11:38 -0500, Alan Watson wrote: > However, I think it would be reasonable to explicitly state in the SRFI > document whether a SRFI (a) can be implemented using only R5RS features; > (b) can be implemented in all common Schemes using non-R5RS features; or > (c) cannot be implemented in all common Schemes. > > Obviously, "all common Schemes" is open to interpretation, but it should > certainly include Scheme48, and so, in the spirit of full disclosure, > SRFI-55 should include a statement along the lines of (c). It sounds like you are suggesting additional process for the SRFI mechanism itself. Perhaps that question should be posed in a more general forum, where the SRFI process authors would read and respond? Robby