[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 53 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 53 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:41:48AM -0500, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> Your proposal, while more brief, conflates declaring the
> transformer and binding it, and only in define forms but not
> let(rec)-forms - in the latter you still have to write it out the long
> way.  

I was suggesting doing the same for let-syntax, using something like