This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 52 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 52 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Yup, as extended character-set specific/extended functions should likely be. > From: Ken Dickey <Ken.Dickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Organization: BitWize Consulting > Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:20:46 +0100 > To: Paul Schlie <schlie@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <srfi-52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: char-whitespace? > > On Monday 16 February 2004 12:01 am, Paul Schlie wrote: >> (over all, it's interesting that possibly in lieu of worrying about any >> specific character-sets, it may be more productive to define the presumed >> display semantics of a more abstract language/platform dependant >> character-set, ... > > I may have misunderstood, but I think that "display semantics" above the > Unicode level is something far beyond character handling and better dealt > with in libraries. > > Layout, ligature, and font specifics are quite involved. [I did some early > work on multi-language support for Java/Unicode display at Apple and found it > quite complex]. > > Again, MIT/GNU Scheme aside, one seldom ships a text editor/layout engine with > a Scheme compiler. > > $0.02, > -KenD >