[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making the new let easier to stomach
sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:
> This looks good. I'd personally replace some of the dotted pairs by
> ellipsis constructions, as attached. It would be good if one version
> or the other were part of the SRFI. Let me know if you agree, and
> I'll stick it into the draft.
> [version favoring ellipses over dots
> which sounds like a no-op but ain't :) ]
Thanks, that's grand, let's use yours. I prefer the less powerful but more
general-purpose dot operator when applicable, but it seems that ellipses and
unquote-splicing are favored in the wider code pool. As I see it, this is a
cool forum, and a little consistency will probably go far. Good to see that
overall structure didn't need to be changed, I haven't done much templating.
Neat in their way, but I got waaaay turned off veeeery early on by the lack of
non-hygienic bindings. Got any dirty pre-emptive hacks for dirty template
bindings? Otherwise I'm likely to waste time mucking about with eval in a
couple SRFIs I've held off in anticipation of requests for R5RS code.
Regards, [Ag] Andy Gaynor silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx