This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 5 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 5 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Hi Andy, Many thanks for creating SRFI 5. Two comments: - You're essentially arguing for replacing R5RS let with the one you propose. This is totally valid. As it SRFI, your proposal is still only a suggestion for an addition to the language. Why not rename it to something other than let? This would also make it easier to use for people dealing with legacy code. - Is there a way to define the construct using standard R5RS macros rather than explicit renaming (which is only supported by one or two Scheme systems)? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla