[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pretty-print and ~C
On Monday 22 December 2003 05:08 am, Alex Shinn wrote:
> Since the primary function of pretty-print is to format code, shouldn't
> it be defined in terms of write rather than display? For consistency
> with ~& it may actually make sense to define the minimal pretty-print to
> be something like
> (define (pretty-print obj port)
> (newline port)
> (write obj port)
> (newline port))
> Should ~C display the character, write the character, or display the
> name of the character as in CL? ~A is for display and ~S for write, so
> I would suggest the latter (currently it's the equivalent of ~A).
You are correct in both cases. I will change the code.