This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 46 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 46 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.
[ Slippinrippindangfangrottenzargbargadingdong! I did it _again_! ] On Saturday, Oct 11, 2003, at 14:08 US/Eastern, bear wrote:
But I don't know if we really need this special form, since an ellipsis (or a sequence of them) can already be used to match an ellipsis (or a longer sequence of them). IOW, what would we use the special form for that we couldn't use an ellipsis for?
You've lost me here. Ellipsis is for matching a sequence; how can ellipsis match literal ellipsis? Are you talking about an arbitrarily nested number
of ellipses, i.e. to be matched with (::: ...), in which case we _still_ need :::?