[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fundamental design flaws



On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:00:01PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
> At Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:52:06 -0600, scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > 44 never just takes an existing vector or list and says "Hey, you're an 
> > SRFI-44 sequence".  Valid 44 collections must be created using the 
> > make-list and make-vector or list and vector constructors.  Any behavior 
> > with primitive Scheme types is undefined.
> 
> So SRFI-44 make-vector is incompatible with the R5RS make-vector, and
> SRFI-44 make-list is incompatible with SRFI-1 make-list?

As it currently stands no.  And if we choose to make it so we'll need 
to rename them for obvious reasons.

	Scott

Attachment: pgpii4kpWVNOd.pgp
Description: PGP signature