[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fundamental design flaws
At Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:52:06 -0600, scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 44 never just takes an existing vector or list and says "Hey, you're an
> SRFI-44 sequence". Valid 44 collections must be created using the
> make-list and make-vector or list and vector constructors. Any behavior
> with primitive Scheme types is undefined.
So SRFI-44 make-vector is incompatible with the R5RS make-vector, and
SRFI-44 make-list is incompatible with SRFI-1 make-list?