[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A possible solution?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:53:19PM -0800, bear wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >So basically you want to drop all these useful types because they don't
> >exist yet?  That makes so much sense.
> You're just trolling here, aren't you?
> Things that don't exist aren't useful.  EVER.

Only if they never exist.  By your rationale, the authors should never 
have specified call/cc.  After all, no Scheme implementations existed 
yet, so how is it useful?

<personal attacks: snip>


Attachment: pgpDthPJFuYqs.pgp
Description: PGP signature