On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:53:19PM -0800, bear wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >So basically you want to drop all these useful types because they don't > >exist yet? That makes so much sense. > > You're just trolling here, aren't you? > > Things that don't exist aren't useful. EVER. Only if they never exist. By your rationale, the authors should never have specified call/cc. After all, no Scheme implementations existed yet, so how is it useful? <personal attacks: snip> Scott
Attachment:
pgpDthPJFuYqs.pgp
Description: PGP signature