On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:48:34AM -0800, bear wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >I'd like to know what beyond lacking collection specific shortcut > >functions is inefficient in the current SRFI. > > You're joking, right? Without the "shortcut functions" as you call them > being more efficient, there is no reason for most of these collections to > exist at all. But they cannot be defined if they don't apply to the general class of collections. They need to be defined for those concrete classes or a more specific general one (like ordered tree). Scott
Attachment:
pgpfaUy1UwOdi.pgp
Description: PGP signature