On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:44:55PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote: > > > From: scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > <chuckle> Nice try. I'll say it again. Withdrawal is only > > necessary if=20 there are fundamental flaws throught the SRFI. > > The opposite is true,=20 there are some flaws in very limited > > parts of the SRFI. > > > You want valuable feedback? Withdraw it. You don't? Fine, your > finalized 44 is an example of what not to do. I'll be sure to cite it > as such at the first opportunity. Again, there is still room for discussion before finalization without withdrawal. Only you and Bradd seem to think its a finalize now or withdraw situation. Scott
Attachment:
pgpxhPkw86xuz.pgp
Description: PGP signature