[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reasons for withdrawal

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:42:20PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > From: scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     > There is simply no way to have genericly programmable
>     > collections without some generic dispatch mechanism.  Nearly all
>     > Scheme implementations currently have it.
> So what if they do?  Are those mechanisms standardized in a SRFI?

They don't need to be, just as the mechanisms for implementing 
continuations or threads don't need to be standardized to support 
SRFI-18.  It would be nice if they were, but we can have a portable 
implementation without them.


Attachment: pgpOchShQf3X8.pgp
Description: PGP signature