[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reasons for withdrawal

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 44 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 44 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:03:05PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > From: scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     > we have a majority concensus.  We have, so far, Oleg,=20 myself,
>     > Taylor, and Matthias for continued discussion towards
>     > correction=20 of concrete issues, vs yourself, Tom, and Ray
>     > against.
> Everyone, on both sides, agrees on the need for continued
> consideration.
> As nearly as I can tell, what you've said there amounts to:
> 	"Everyone agrees: withdrawal is the best course of action."

<chuckle> Nice try.  I'll say it again.  Withdrawal is only necessary if 
there are fundamental flaws throught the SRFI.  The opposite is true, 
there are some flaws in very limited parts of the SRFI.


Attachment: pgpV2PydTYgp4.pgp
Description: PGP signature