[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reasons for withdrawal

To: scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Reasons for withdrawal
From: Tom Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Cc: srfi-44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031028224418.GA7748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
References: <200310282136.NAA22934@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <039901c39d9f$b040bf20$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031028223611.GK18819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031028224418.GA7748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


    > From: scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    > we have a majority concensus.  We have, so far, Oleg,=20 myself,
    > Taylor, and Matthias for continued discussion towards
    > correction=20 of concrete issues, vs yourself, Tom, and Ray
    > against.

Everyone, on both sides, agrees on the need for continued
consideration.

As nearly as I can tell, what you've said there amounts to:

	"Everyone agrees: withdrawal is the best course of action."

-t

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reasons for withdrawal
  - From: scgmille

References:
- Re: Reasons for withdrawal
  - From: Tom Lord
- RE: Reasons for withdrawal
  - From: Anton van Straaten
- Re: Reasons for withdrawal
  - From: Bradd W. Szonye
- Re: Reasons for withdrawal
  - From: scgmille

Prev by Date: Re: Reasons for withdrawal
Next by Date: Re: Reasons for withdrawal
Previous by thread: Re: Reasons for withdrawal
Next by thread: Re: Reasons for withdrawal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread