This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 44 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 44 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:36:11PM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote: > I agree that last-minute sabotage would be a bad thing. However, keep in > mind that the SRFI process is about consensus. If it were just me > arguing, no matter how vocally, I'd still recommend finalization (so > long as the final version met the basic SRFI requirements, which the > current draft does not). Not to be inflamatory, but the SRFI process is in part a response to the unanimous RnRS process which severely restricts forward motion. It is bad style to finalize an SRFI without concensus, but its hard to say at this point whether we have a majority concensus. We have, so far, Oleg, myself, Taylor, and Matthias for continued discussion towards correction of concrete issues, vs yourself, Tom, and Ray against. This is why I want more opinions. I'm especially wanting to hear informed opinions from implementors and respected members of the Scheme community. Scott
Description: PGP signature