This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 44 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 44 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:00:59AM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote: [criticism] > From: scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Tough. That is the only way you'll convince me of a flaw. No > amount of positive proof through implementation is likely to > satisfy you. That's obviously false, of course. Your combative attitude does nothing but discredit your SRFI. Brad's criticisms appear to be largely on the mark. As I said, you obviously are not clueless about collections -- but you are not quite "getting" the quality expectations that define what some of us would consider to be "a good SRFI" rather than "one of the SRFIs to disregard". Reset the clock. Withdraw. You'll be joining the ranks of such obvious losers (<sarcasm> there) as Clinger. -t