[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [oleg@xxxxxxxxx: Interface view of dictionaries]

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 44 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 44 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:04:15AM -0800, bear wrote:
> It argues for the implementation of those operations *EVEN ON
> was, in fact, my whole point.  Only if the operations exist on
> all dictionaries will they be used in "generic" code.  Only if
> they are used in "generic" code will the benefits, where available,
> be realized in general systems.

I see your point entirely.  My main argument is against operations that 
don't make any sense for some collections.  For ones which do generalize 
but are implementable in terms of the more basic operations, there is 
little point *except* efficiency.  In that case, the operators should be 
defined over a superset of collections where they're both defined and 
can be implemented more efficiently.  For the general classes of SRFI, 
neither point holds.  


Attachment: pgpiBEsnZXXyu.pgp
Description: PGP signature