[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 43 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 43 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

*To*: <srfi-43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Subject*: VECTOR-UNFOLD and VECTOR-TABULATE*From*: <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:05:11 -0800 (PST)*Delivered-to*: srfi-43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Importance*: Normal

It occurred to me earlier today that VECTOR-UNFOLD is _not_ an inherently silly operation; it's just a VECTOR-UNFOLD that does not produce a fixed-size vector that's silly. Indeed, if the size of the resulting vector is fixed at the time VECTOR-UNFOLD is applied, it is VECTOR-TABULATE that is a silly operation, as it is trivially written in terms of VECTOR-UNFOLD, but VECTOR-UNFOLD is much more general. So I'd like to flush VECTOR-TABULATE in favour of VECTOR-UNFOLD: (VECTOR-UNFOLD <f> <length> <initial-seed> ...) -> [seed ...] (F <integer> <seed> ...) -> [new-seed ...] The fundamental vector constructor. Create a vector whose length is LENGTH and iterate across each index I between 0 and LENGTH, applying F to I and the current seeds, initializing the Ith slot in the new vector to the first value that F returned and continuing on with the seeds becoming the other values that F returned. VECTOR-TABULATE is just VECTOR-UNFOLD but with no seeds. While I'm at it, I'd like to add VECTOR-UNFOLD-RIGHT again. Objections?

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: VECTOR-UNFOLD and VECTOR-TABULATE***From:*campbell

- Prev by Date:
**Updates to near finalization (finally!)** - Next by Date:
**re: Updates to near finalization (finally!)** - Previous by thread:
**re: Updates to near finalization (finally!)** - Next by thread:
**Re: VECTOR-UNFOLD and VECTOR-TABULATE** - Index(es):