This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 43 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 43 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
It seems that VECTOR-REVERSE! accepts start+end arguments, while VECTOR-REVERSE does not; they make sense in both cases. Opposition to adding start+end to the non-destructive VECTOR-REVERSE? If not, I'll add it in the next draft.