[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Function name: concatentate?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 43 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 43 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Taylor Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Function name: concatentate?
From: tb@xxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 08 Apr 2003 11:45:06 -0700
Cc: Paulo Jorge de Oliveira Cantante de Matos <pocm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, srfi-43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <74B66ECA-69B5-11D7-99A0-00039309311E@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <74B66ECA-69B5-11D7-99A0-00039309311E@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Taylor Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes, it should be VECTOR-CONCATENATE.  In fact, I've fixed that
> already, but the
> document just hasn't been updated yet.

Aww, if Unix can have "creat", can't Scheme have "concatentate"?

References:
- Re: Function name: concatentate?
  - From: Taylor Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: SRFI-43: some minor comments
Next by Date: Re: AW: Several comments
Previous by thread: Re: Function name: concatentate?
Next by thread: Ref Impl for SRFI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread