[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problems with SRFI document

Andre van Tonder wrote:
Just a couple of comments on the fix:

1) The stream-low-level-lazy, ...strict, ...delay and ...force
   implementations have a pretty serious bug.  This bug was discovered by
   Alexandro Forero Cuervo and discussed on the SRFI-45
   list (with some spillover to the SRFI-40 list).  I posted a
   fix - please see the patched SRFI-45 document for the details.
   (also, AFC posted a patched version of SRFI-40 incorporating
   a version of the fix to this list).

2) I believe the discussion of stream-unfoldn in the first
   part of the implementation section was obsoleted by the
   SRFI-45-style promises (indeed, the actual implementation
   below it was then changed back to using the naive
   version, which should be correct and safe for space).

I've checked in changes to address both of these issues.  Please
let me know if any other problems exist with the reference