[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators

To: Al Jazeera Petrofsky <al-jazeera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:34:07 +0200
Cc: neubauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200308051112.EAA28568@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Al Jazeera Petrofsky's message of "Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:13:22 +0200 (DFT)")
References: <xg8adap5etq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y9ln0eoik9u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <xg87k5s7733.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200308051112.EAA28568@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.5 (cassava, berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "Al" == Al Jazeera Petrofsky <al-jazeera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Al> For error messages to have full California-speak effect, the dude
Al> should be prepended and postpended to the content:

Al>   "Dude, you have to stop prepending to the result stream, dude!"

Isn't California more like:

"Dude, you, like, have to stop prepending to the result stream, dude?"

This style might have gone out of fashion since I was there, though.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

References:
- Re: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators
  - From: Michael Sperber
- Re: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators
  - From: Matthias Neubauer

Prev by Date: Re: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators
Next by Date: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible?
Previous by thread: Re: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators
Next by thread: specification of STREAM-UNFOLDN generators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread