[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Naming convention

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 35 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 35 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: <srfi-35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Naming convention
From: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <bernardp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:08:03 +0200
Delivered-to: srfi-35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <000501c23329$6a1a0100$d701a8c0@foxi><y9l8z41p1h8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <15678.53821.709735.121868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <bernardp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: "John David Stone" <stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> >  Alternative suggestions?
> 
>         The oddity is the use of the ampersand as the initial character.
> One alternative suggestion would be to use the names CONDITION,
> MESSAGE-CONDITION, SERIOUS-CONDITION, and 
> ERROR-CONDITION.

I second this.  Let's use fully spelled names.

P.

References:
- Naming convention
  - From: felix
- Re: Naming convention
  - From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
- Re: Naming convention
  - From: John David Stone

Prev by Date: Re: Naming convention
Next by Date: Re: Naming convention
Previous by thread: Re: Naming convention
Next by thread: Re: Naming convention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread