This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 35 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 35 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Is there a particular reason why condition types are prefixed with "&"? I find this rather ugly. One just has to take a look at PLT's units/signatures to see a how such syntactical conventions can go totally haywire. I don't want Scheme code to look like Perl in a couple of years. ;-) cheers, felix