[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finally clauses
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
Is it your understanding that the srfi process is about producing
No, as it happens, but that is irrelevent. To recapitulate:
Bear: The business of passing around thunks and continuations
as objects as in SRFI 34 seems to me to get in my way and
complicate things, and I don't think it actually provides
more generality or functionality.
Richard Kelsey: The generality it provides is that it runs in
implementations of R5RS.
Specifying SRFI 34, or any other SRFI, in terms of R5RS has utility.
I said nothing about it being a requirement.