[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Finally clauses

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 34 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 34 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: srfi-34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dmason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Finally clauses
From: Dave Mason <dmason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 10:58:17 -0400
Delivered-to: srfi-34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:10:56 BST." <20020809151056.A2425@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (中ノ庄) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (alpha-redhat-linux)

I'd add my vote for finally, too.  Even if it doesn't solve all the
world's problems, it solves enough of them to be very handy.  And I
realize I could wrap the try/catch in a dynamic-wind, but it seems
rather nicely related to try/catch and exceptions.

../Dave

References:
- Finally clauses
  - From: Tony Garnock-Jones

Prev by Date: Finally clauses
Next by Date: Re: Finally clauses
Previous by thread: Finally clauses
Next by thread: Re: Finally clauses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread