[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please rename TRY to something else
> From: "Manual Serrano" <Manuel.Serrano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I will have a look at the specification but first of all, let me ask you
> a favor. Bigloo is already using TRY. It is already a special form for
> Bigloo. Please give me a chance to implement SRFi-34 by renaming this
> The Bigloo form takes two arguments and SRFI-34's takes three, so
> there should be no technical problem with implementing both. It
> would be a bit ugly.
> Can you suggest another name? TRY seems the natural one.
SRFI-12 used HANDLE-EXCEPTIONS. Was this considered too
verbose, or are there any other reason for choosing a different name?
(I'm just asking - I know that TRY is well established in other