[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 33 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 33 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

*To*: srfi-33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: would it be possible to change any of the function names?*From*: Bengt Kleberg <eleberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:54:40 +0200 (MET DST)*Delivered-to*: srfi-33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Reply-to*: Bengt Kleberg <eleberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

greetings, beeing very late in joining this dicussion i would like to excuse myself for make these kind of big, but not very constructiv, suggestions. those readers happy with the function names in the current proposal need not read further. i have no objection to the functionality/set of operations offered by the "Integer Bitwise-operation Library" by Olin Shivers. instead i would like to change function names and argument order to make them slightly more reminiscent of the string and vector operations. 1 would it be possible to change arithmetic-shift i count -> exact-integer to bit-shift-left i count -> exact-integer bit-shift-right i count -> exact-integer 2 would it be possible to change bit-set? index i -> boolean any-bits-set? test-bits i -> boolean all-bits-set? test-bits i -> boolean first-set-bit i -> exact-integer to bit-set? i index -> boolean bit-set-any? i test-bits -> boolean bit-set-all? i test-bits -> boolean bit-set-smallest i -> exact-integer 3 would it be possible to change extract-bit-field size position i -> exact-integer test-bit-field? size position i -> boolean clear-bit-field size position i -> exact-integer replace-bit-field size position new-field i -> exact-integer copy-bit-field size position from to -> exact-integer to bit-field-extract i size position -> exact-integer bit-field-test? i size position -> boolean bit-field-clear i size position -> exact-integer bit-field-replace i size position new-field -> exact-integer bit-field-copy from to size position -> exact-integer 4 i have been unable to find a better name for integer-length i -> nonnegative-exact-integer but would really like to have a 'bit' prefix here too. bengt

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: would it be possible to change any of the function names?***From:*David Rush

- Prev by Date:
**Re: names, trivial ops, variadic extensions & bitwise-=** - Next by Date:
**Re: would it be possible to change any of the function names?** - Previous by thread:
**any-bits-set? and all-bits-set?** - Next by thread:
**Re: would it be possible to change any of the function names?** - Index(es):